Spreadsheet vs Keyzee · What you actually buy

Five things a spreadsheet can't do.
Keyzee does them by default.

You can chart a master key system in Excel. You just can't validate it, audit it, or get it into a code machine without re-keying every cut by hand. Here's the honest difference, no editorial.

  • Phantom-safe
  • MACS-enforced
  • Auditable
  • Machine-exportable
  • Hours, not days
01
The benefits

What you actually get for A$49/mo. Not a tool. A safety net.

01 · Phantom-safe

Validated against ~50,000 shear-line combinations.

Up to fifty thousand candidate cuts per cylinder, run against the full access matrix. Every cross-master opener — the kind a phantom key represents — is caught before pinning. A spreadsheet can't enumerate this; it's the only feature whose absence shows up as a 6am callback.

02 · MACS-enforced

Adjacent-cut spec checked at build, not at the bench.

MACS, depth limits, thin-pin spread — validated before the system grades. A spreadsheet lets you ship a system the cutter rejects; debug at the workshop costs more than the software.

03 · Auditable

Every change keyed to a tech, timestamped, restorable.

Issue, return, replacement — a single key register your building manager can reference five years later. Restricted-keyway compliance failure is a licence risk; 'Tom — which is master B again?' is the spreadsheet's universal pain.

04 · Machine-exportable

One click to .ick, .gcd, .skd, .csv, .pdf.

Silca Futura Pro, HPC CodeMax, Framon, MasterKing — load directly. The spreadsheet path is 're-key every cut into the cutter': single biggest time sink in the workflow, and it doesn't appear in any quote.

05 · Hours, not days

~30 min per 12-door / 3-master job. ~4 hrs in Excel.

Survey → build → grade → export → handover PDF. The first job clears the subscription; the second is profit. See the math in section 03.

02
Side by side

Same job. Two outcomes.

What you need In a spreadsheet In Keyzee
Phantom-key check Cross-master openers caught before pinning Manual. Slow. Often skipped. ~50,000 combos validated. Inline severity classification.
MACS validation Adjacent-cut spec respected on every key Eye-checked. Catches at the bench. Enforced at build. Cuts that would jam never ship.
Machine-readable export Direct load into the code machine Re-key every cut into the cutter. .ick / .gcd / .skd / .csv / .pdf in one click.
Audit trail Who issued, who returned, what got rekeyed Margin notes in red. Version-name dread. Timestamped per change. Restorable. Per-tech log.
Handover record The compliance doc the building manager files Separate Word doc. Re-typed every job. PDF auto-generated. System ID + signatures + key register.
Time to graded system Survey → build → grade → export ~4 hrs. ~30 min.
03
When it pays for itself

First job clears the subscription. Maybe second.

In Excel ~4 hrs

Including the phantom hand-check, if you do one. Most don't.

In Keyzee ~30 min

Surveyed → built → graded → exported. With handover PDF.

Difference A$455

Saved 3.5 hours at A$130/hr workshop rate. Subscription clears inside the first job.

Open the engine. Ship a graded system.
30 days, no card.

Sample project ships pre-loaded with a 3-master Lockwood 570 system. Run it, swap profiles, time the work. The break-even is two MK jobs at restricted-keyway prices.

Setup in 60 seconds Sample project included Cancel anytime